Lets look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and builtin webdisk

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

웹하드 순위 The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.



Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.



Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.

It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.

If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the perfect solution is.

The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.



It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.



Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. Therefore the usage of web hard has become common.



But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.



The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.



In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without having to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.



Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one according to the reality and needs.